| 翻訳と辞書 |
| De Jonge v. Oregon ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
De Jonge v. Oregon
''De Jonge v. Oregon'', 299 U.S. 353 (1937), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause applies to freedom of assembly. The Court found that Dirk De Jonge had the right to speak at a peaceful public meeting held by the Communist Party, even though the party generally advocated industrial or political change in revolution. However, in the 1950s with the fear of communism on the rise the Court ruled in ''Dennis v. United States'' (1951) that Eugene Dennis, who was the leader of the Communist Party, violated the Smith Act by advocating the forcible overthrow of the United States government.
==Background==
Oregon's "criminal syndicalism" statute made it a crime to, among other things "assist in conducting any assemblage of persons ... which teaches or advocates ... the doctrine which advocates crime, physical violence, sabotage, or any unlawful acts or methods as a means of accomplishing or effecting industrial or political change or revolution."〔''De Jonge v. Oregon'', 299 U.S. 353, 356 n.1 (1937).〕 The statute was similar to state laws the Court had upheld in cases like ''Gitlow v. New York'' (1925) and ''Whitney v. California'' (1927).
Dirk De Jonge addressed an audience at a regarding jail conditions in the county and a maritime strike in progress in Portland at a meeting called by the Portland branch of the Communist Party on July 27, 1934. De Jonge was a member of the Party, but the meeting was open to the public and had been publicly advertised as such.〔''Id.'' at 358-59.〕 A raid on the meeting was carried out by Portland police. De Jonge was arrested and charged with violating the State's criminal syndicalism statute. Once convicted, De Jonge motioned for an acquittal, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to warrant his conviction, since there was no evidence that either De Jonge nor anyone else at the meeting advocated violent acts or revolution.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1936/1936_123 )〕 The Oregon Supreme Court upheld his conviction, ruling that the indictment did not charge De Jonge with criminal syndicalism, but rather that he "presided at, conducted and assisted in conducting an assemblage of persons, organization, society and group called by the Communist Party, which was unlawfully teaching and advocating in Multnomah county the doctrine of criminal syndicalism and sabotage." In other words, De Jonge was convicted for associating with the Communist Party, which at other times, although not at that meeting, had advocated criminal syndicalism.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/299/353/ )〕 De Jonge took his case to the Supreme Court, arguing that his conviction violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「De Jonge v. Oregon」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|